Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bonaparte

It seems to be a long standing tradition to appoint folks to SCOTUS without experience as a judge. Now if we could just go one step further and appoint an American who hasn't been tainted at all by the Law School Loonies who pervade our centers of higher learning... I like Glen Beck's idea, let's appoint a Midwestern farmer. Just a simple "that ain't right" or "sounds good to me," in the written judicial opinions. Oh could you imagine the mortified howl from the Leftists? It gives me goosebumps. I would argue that law school only serves to obscure the difference between right and wrong. Here's our farmer deliberating one picture of a 32 wk fetus with a vacuum suction into the cranium, one naughty film of Adam and Steve on their honeymoon night...


36 posted on 10/03/2005 9:21:39 PM PDT by Harrius Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Harrius Magnus
I wouldn't object to a farmer or a mechanic or a laundromat owner serving on the USSC, as long as he could demonstrate a thorough understanding of the law and the courts.

I think you're right that law schools offer fertile breeding ground for the kind of arrogance seen in a Bill Clinton or an Ira Magaziner. But it's ultimately up to the individual, as shown by the way Clarence Thomas and Mark Levin turned out.

38 posted on 10/03/2005 9:34:53 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson