I say she has something else, something that is extremely valuable and has been lacking on the court. I think she is a consensus builder. Both Scalia and Thomas are totally brilliant, but they have been unable to bring others to their side of the arguement. I think Ms. Mier possesses this talent in spades. To argue a point takes brains, to argue a point and convince others you are right without insulting their intelligence and convincing them to join you takes brilliance.
I am interested in this. May I ask, without intent to insult, what makes you think so?