Agreed. I think it's fine to disagree with the President, but I think it should be based on something other than what pundits say...get some info first.
There's so much knee jerk reaction.
As opposed to knee jerk agreement with the pick. What's the agreement based on?
Why should I support the pick? That's all anyone is asking. What evidence leads you to believe this is a good pick?
I know there are a lot of others I could easily support. Tell me why I should support this pick other than "Bush must know something we don't". That's not reassuring to me when I already see multiple "CONSERVATIVE" appointments on the bench that are big dissapointments.
Given the choice of supporting or not supporting based upon lack of knowledge and blind faith, I obviously choose NOT supporting.