That's irrelevant. Use the information you are aware of. You seem to be making a "Senators know best" argument even though we have seen what they have given us on the SCOTUS. I don't understand why you would expect conservatives to ignore common sense and to put all of their faith into those who selected Kennedy/Souter/O'Conner without wanting to consider that the current nominee gave large sums of money to Michael Dukakis five days before the 1988 Presidential election in the final push before election day.
What side are you on?
I'm on whatever side it is that can get you to shut the hell up.
Aren't you putting the cart before the horse on this one? Would it not be prudent to calm down and take time to let this woman speak for herself? Do you believe it is fair to jump to conclusions when we have yet to know so little about her? Oh sure, the web has been FULL, brimming to the eyeballs FULL, of rumors, speculation, and even a few facts tossed in. Liberals are fighting Liberals on this, and apparently Conservatives are fighting Conservatives on this.
IMHO, that fact alone should tell you that perhaps you shouldn't be making a decision about this woman's integrity within hours of her nomination.