Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedMonqey
I bet you one of the dying few who still think Souter as an conservative

No. Bush's dad knew nothing about Souter other than what Rudman and Sununu told him.

Bush has been working with Harriett Meiers for TWELVE YEARS. He knows her, and likely learned more as she vetted the recent crop of SC potentials.

I honestly believe that the main reason behind the downcast faces here is that most wanted to get into a pissing contest with the Democrats on the judiciary committee.

Deep down, that's true, isn't it?

Why is it that Bush has named tremendous candidates to the Appeals Courts, but, all of a sudden, you guys think Bush has gone soft on appointments to the highest court in the land?

235 posted on 10/03/2005 4:35:42 PM PDT by sinkspur (Breed every trace of the American Staffordshire Terrier out of existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
"Bush has been working with Harriett Meiers for TWELVE YEARS. He knows her, and likely learned more as she vetted the recent crop of SC potentials."

Closeness can be like viewing the world through a microscope.

She may be competent at her job and still be an "kiss $$" to what the boss wants to hear.

AKA Bill Clinton after the 86 elections.

Suddenly he's the "era of big government is over" point guy.

Ambitious people act the way they want to BE SEEN as whatever pleases the people at any given time, not as they actually are.
"I honestly believe that the main reason behind the downcast faces here is that most wanted to get into a pissing contest with the Democrats on the judiciary committee. Deep down, that's true, isn't it?" BR>

No. The top Democrats are falling over themselves in order to be first in PRAISING Ms. Miers" Doesn't that alone make your skin crawl? BR>She may well prove us dissenters wrong. I'd feel alot more comfortable if she had a proven history of conservative decisions behind her.


Only time will tell "Why is it that Bush has named tremendous candidates to the Appeals Courts, but, all of a sudden, you guys think Bush has gone soft on appointments to the highest court in the land?" Appeals courts are small potatoes compared to the SC. If so, then why appoint less qualified, less experienced Miers over the more qualified Appeals Court judges? It smacks of CRONYISM, a despicable act that erodes a society that values hard work and promotes a "Schmooser", Kiss up to the Boss attitude. Great way to run a country.(gag)
587 posted on 10/04/2005 7:41:46 AM PDT by RedMonqey (Life is hard. It's even harder when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson