Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harriet Miers -- pro, part 1 (long but informative)
world magazine ^

Posted on 10/03/2005 9:02:27 AM PDT by hipaatwo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Ol' Sparky

I don't see how a strict constructionist, a fundamental pro-life Christian is a move to the left.<p<But than again, that's just me.


21 posted on 10/03/2005 9:13:39 AM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
But does she believe in Federalism? That may be more a relevant qualification with respect to her recent appointment.

Nathan Hecht -- a staunch, pro-life Texas Supreme Court judge and very close friend of Miers -- says that her view of the constitution is the same as her view on the Bible:  what was the original intent of the authors.

Stingray: Conservative blog       

        <-------- Visit Stingray blogsite for conservative Christian commentary

22 posted on 10/03/2005 9:13:50 AM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Chill,

Republicans didn't really exist in Texas in the 1980's also recall that Gore was a pro-life dixiecrat in 1988.


23 posted on 10/03/2005 9:14:15 AM PDT by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Peach

What a Souter. (/sarc)


24 posted on 10/03/2005 9:14:18 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
"Enough said. Bush has betrayed the base."

And Reagan was a democrat before he was a Republican. I guess we were all wrong about him too.

25 posted on 10/03/2005 9:14:59 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Just because I missed it, why did Britt Mention FR? Thanks in advance.


26 posted on 10/03/2005 9:15:00 AM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

some more background here.


27 posted on 10/03/2005 9:16:53 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Hey Sparky,

I'm part of the base and I'm fine with this pick.


28 posted on 10/03/2005 9:18:49 AM PDT by perez24 (Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Here's my favorite section from the post:

Hecht says about Miers' judicial philosophy: "She's an orginalist -- that's the way she takes the Bible," and that's her approach to the Constitution as well --"Originalist -- it means what it says." He notes that her legal practice involved writing contracts rather than tort law, so she was always looking at the plain meaning of the words: "Originalist." He also says she's not a social butterfly who will be swayed by Washington dinner table conversation: "She goes to the dinners she's supposed to go to. She's not on the social circuit."


29 posted on 10/03/2005 9:19:25 AM PDT by Califelephant (Liberals: "We've always been soft on criminals, but now we're soft on terrorists too.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gramho12

Some people just want any excuse to run the Republicans down so that they can more easily market whatever kooky crew they've hitched their wagons on to.

Just my humble opinion. :)


30 posted on 10/03/2005 9:19:37 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: twigs
I voted for Jimmy Carter. TwiceI would have too if I had been old enough the first time! I did, however, vote for Mondale and Dukakis. I did not vote for Clinton, but neither did I vote for Bush 1. As a "neo" conservative, I am very ardent in my views now, I have "seen" and known the other side. This nomination could be a pleasant surprise.
31 posted on 10/03/2005 9:19:51 AM PDT by Paradox (Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bereanway

I guess that's one of the advantages of being a pessimist.

You're always pleasantly suprised. :D


32 posted on 10/03/2005 9:20:19 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I think she'll be fine.


33 posted on 10/03/2005 9:20:26 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS

I remember when Al Gore was pro-life. So were other dems. Sam Nunn was pro-life and had a lot of conservative Christians on his staff. Then he announced he was pro-choice, although I do not remember the words he used. I was absolutely stunned. It seemed to me back then that decent dems with presidential aspirations felt that they had to turn their backs on life to move ahead. Nunn retired; Gore... I'm still not sure what he did.


34 posted on 10/03/2005 9:20:29 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
There's a true saying, "The most vocal nonsmoker is a former smoker". I voted for Perot -- I take responsibility for Clinton's election. But Clinton was the best thing for me. That is when I started listening to Rush & realized I was a bone marrow conservative.
35 posted on 10/03/2005 9:21:03 AM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Just because I missed it, why did Britt Mention FR?


Dunno. No t.v. on. Listening to Rush and cooking Rosh Hashannah dinner.


36 posted on 10/03/2005 9:21:31 AM PDT by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
"Hecht, 55 and never married, and Harriet Miers, 60 and never married, have known each other for 30 years and are -- to quote Hecht -- "very close friends."

Ummmm....My Grand Daddy told me when I was a teen ager, "Anyone that was not married by the age of 40 is either gay (He didn't quite use the politically correct term) or of superior intelligence."

37 posted on 10/03/2005 9:24:54 AM PDT by moasicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

If you remember back in the 1980s, Al Gore was a lot more conservative. His wife began the whole issue about labeling music, etc. for age-appropriateness. He went more left in the late 80s, probably looking at the democratic party and seeing that it wasn't family-oriented any more, so why should he be?


38 posted on 10/03/2005 9:25:25 AM PDT by Shery (S. H. in APOland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Thanks for the information. I'm inclined to believe that she could be qualified to serve on the SC, based on this information. I'm juggling a lot of stuff right now, and I'm far behind in the nomination process.


39 posted on 10/03/2005 9:27:12 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("President Bush, start building that wall"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

I have to admit I had serious doubts about this nominee when I heard about the apparent support of certain dim senators. If this is true, I doubt the dim support will hang on for long.


40 posted on 10/03/2005 9:28:39 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson