OK...can we look at her history?
Try THIS site to see some of her legal ideas...
I'll quote some, thanks to stellar...
" in 1990 Miers voted for a 7 percent property tax increase during her short tenure on the Dallas City Council"
"For instance, she apparently submitted the following report to the ABA's House of Delegates. Here are two of the report's recommendations:
Supports the enactment of laws and public policy which provide that sexual orientation shall not be a bar to adoption when the adoption is determined to be in the best interest of the child. ...
Recommends the development and establishment of an International Criminal Court."
Now...does THAT sound "Conservative"? Or is this in line with a Dukakoid/DemonRAT agenda?
Is this a Scalia/Thomas type Justice candidate? Or more like a Ruth Badder-Meinhoff Ginsburg/Souter/Stevens/Breyer type?
Then I guess all the known conservatives that have come out supporting her are really stupid, and guys like you are the real geniusus who for some reason, aren't running the party. Why is that? Can you explain that to me? God I'm sick of people, liberal and conservative, who are such great Monday morning Quarterbacks, from a position of being totally out of the loop and having nothing to lose if they're wrong, and nothing to gain if they're right. All the con is supposition, and decades old opinions. All the pro is things she's actually said and done the past decade+, and many proven conservatives who are supporting her. The Pro outweighs the Con. But most of all, I'm fed up with conservatives who are willing to crucify someone when the facts are still not known about her! That's the kind of stupid irrationality I expect from liberals. And it makes me ashamed to be a conservative. How about she be proven to be a liberal before she's crucified as one? Jay Sekulo right now is on the radio defending her as a constructionist conservative, and a Christian. I guess He just isn't as smart as all the torch bearing FReepers out in droves today either huh? Whatever!