Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NCSteve
I'm ready to believe. Convince me.

All I know is I'd rather have Bush making the appointments than sKerry or Gore.

Since they're judges we will never know. Sometimes they reverse themselves.

Time will tell, BUT I do know what Bush's intentions are regarding the court. NO ONE can say he's succeeded for many years to come, although there's some key cases coming up this session.

Don't forget Meirs helped W vet his previous appointments, I'm sure HE knows a lot more about her philosophy than all the instant critics. Can we at least have the hearings before casting judgement?

99 posted on 10/03/2005 8:23:10 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Mister Baredog
"All I know is I'd rather have Bush making the appointments than sKerry or Gore."

Good point. The Roberts pick ALONE makes Bush's re-election Worth it!!

Let's be clear about it: On election night 2004, Rehnquist was already dying. A new chief Justice would hae been pickedl. A Kerry pick would have been a Breyer or a Ginsburg - a die-hard Liberal. That would have made for a DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT COURT FOR THE NEXT 2 DECADES.

Roberts will be like Rehnquist and is preventing a move to the Left of the courts. I dont know what Miers will be like, we shall see, but I'm confident she as well would be far better than any Kerry pick would have been.

123 posted on 10/03/2005 12:02:42 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson