Since English isn't apparently your first language, I'll give you a pass on this one. A member of the Federalist Society made a comment. By your logic, you are an official White House spokesman and everything you say should be taken as the official position of the White House. Right. Sure. Whatever.
You are just making things up as you go along...
I see. Do you have some evidence of that, or are you just barking?
...if the liars and idiots are against her like this she must be a good nominee.
And if the Bush lemmings are starting to mindlessly support her like this, I am even more doubtful than before.
Quite a mature way to start your reply. It is indicative of the fact that you have nothing in the way of substance to say and are attempting to artificially prop up your response, and that is indeed what we find in the rest of your response:
A member of the Federalist Society made a comment.
What a ridiculous thing to say. Leonard Leo is not some obscure member from the local law school, he's the executive vice president of the organization.
By your logic, you are an official White House spokesman and everything you say should be taken as the official position of the White House. Right. Sure. Whatever.
No, my logic is that the Executive Vice President does speak for the organization. And as you could have seen, I want to know more about what he bases his statement on, I didn't just declare it to be the end of the discussion. I see that basic common sense and reading comprehension is lost on you - or perhaps you are just lying. In either case, you have no credibility.