Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: msnimje
I do not care if she is distinguished. I believe the Supreme Court is too big a deal to take a chance she may turn out to be okay.

Your argument is that she is not qualified. As petitfour pointed out, the constitution does not list a single qualification to be on the Supreme Court. You don't even need to be a lawyer.

Despite the liberals myth making about this branch of goverment, there is no super power involved in becoming a Justice. Look at the horrible legal decisions of the last quarter century. The esteemed Burger Court gave us Roe v. Wade. The Rhenquist Court's immutable wisdom handed down the decision in Kelo v. City of New London.

The job of an appeals court judge isn't hard. Look at the facts, look at the law, apply the facts to the law. Render a conclusion.

Do you have any basis whatsoever to suggest that she might be less than okay?

179 posted on 10/03/2005 8:47:43 AM PDT by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: bigeasy_70118
Your argument is that she is not qualified. As petitfour pointed out, the constitution does not list a single qualification to be on the Supreme Court. You don't even need to be a lawyer.

Okay, I am willing to change my statement.
She is the LEAST qualified person among the top 15 candidates considered for this nomination.

250 posted on 10/03/2005 2:00:19 PM PDT by msnimje (Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson