Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cautor
I don't like gambling when it's unnecessary

Your time for gambling was over in 2004 when you voted for President Bush. That's when you assessed the situation and decided that Dubya was the man you wanted in the Whitehouse because you believed what he had to say about the war, the future of the courts, and the country in general. Dubya is not gambling because he has known this woman for 10 years. He is the president and he gets to choose his nominees.

For all you know, in 5 years you may just be crowing that a president needs to be nominating people along the lines of Scalia, Thomas, and Meirs.

130 posted on 10/03/2005 7:50:10 AM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: McGavin999

"to be nominating people along the lines of Scalia, Thomas, and Meirs."

You might want to get the spelling right. It's Miers. It remains to be seen whether she will be confirmed. I doubt it.


149 posted on 10/03/2005 8:09:15 AM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson