Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriciaruth
Maybe she is a stealth candidate. No paper trail. As soon as she's on the Court, she huddles with Roberts and Thomas and Scalia and they accept another eminent domain case and reverse the prior ruling.

The problem with this is that the gang of five who voted for New London and against property rights are still on the court: Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer and Ginsburg. President Bush has just replaced two of the Justices who voted correctly.

172 posted on 10/03/2005 7:41:00 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Instead we got a Dem approved Bush crony. :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

RE: The five justices who voted for the eminent domain case are still on the Court.

You may be happily surprised how the reasoning of Chief Justice Roberts may alter the thinking of one of those Justices.


238 posted on 10/03/2005 7:46:58 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson