Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckysueb
The reason we're unhappy (to put it mildly) is because he RENEGGED ON HIS WORD and did not pick a justice "in the mold of Scalia and Thomas".

How about posting some FACTS to prove that assertion.

We can all wait.

855 posted on 10/03/2005 6:18:37 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

What a bunch of uninformed whiners. Already this AM Bill Kristol expressed doubts about her - boosting her in my opinion.

When you all get some facts come back and we'll discuss but until then I'm going with my President!


880 posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:46 AM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
How about posting some FACTS to prove that assertion. We can all wait.

I was responding to jstolzens comments. Please go back and read my response again.

1,141 posted on 10/03/2005 7:01:51 AM PDT by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Rehnquist was just a lawyer in the Justice Dept when Nixon tapped him for the Supreme Court.

He turned out quite fine, and I am convinced that the President knows that Miers is a strict constructionist.

I go on faith with this President, and I think he has put the RATS in one Hell of a box.


1,405 posted on 10/03/2005 7:39:59 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson