[LWalk18]

She is pro-choice and a close friend and lawyer of Bush's family. That's enough.

How do we know she is pro-choice? Let's see evidence before we make such a claim.

[Cboldt]

How do we know she is pro-choice? Let's see evidence before we make such a claim.

Her personal opinion is irrelevant, -IF- she subordinates her judicial opinions to the Constitution and legislative intent.

[finnigan2]

" How do we know she is pro-choice? Let's see evidence before we make such a claim."

- I've been skimming through these posts and am truly amazed at the one issue people out there. How they have determined that she's a "pro abortionist" so quickly is quite astonishing.
I think Bush wants a strict constitutionalist on the court and, by picking someone he's worked closely with for years, he's sure that he's got one. The fact that she has no record of decisions from the bench with which to attack her makes her virtually bullet proof. MoveOn.org, the ACLU and Planned Parenthood must be pulling their hair out.