Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
And I'd trust him over you any day.

If Bush had selected Charles Schumer for the seat there are some here who would defend it saying, "He must know something we don't."

Miers today doesn't trouble me nearly as much as what Miers shows every indication of becoming tomorrow: a roll-over liberal appeasing O'Connor clone.

Bush was going to have to fight this battle anyway. If he was determined to name a woman, he should have named Janice Rogers-Brown and let the Democrats beat themselves bloody against her nomination. America would have noticed the grave hypocrisy of the attacks and the Democrats would have paid for it in next year's elections.

And if the Democrats had succeeded in filibustering Rogers-Brown? Then Bush still could have nominated Miers.

He allowed the Democrats to avoid a vigorous self-bashing. Why?

2,544 posted on 10/03/2005 2:24:35 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2509 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

If your first sentence is meant to implicate me, you are a total idiot. I didn't read any farther.


2,567 posted on 10/03/2005 2:34:41 PM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2544 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson