Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Once again, the GOP wing of the Gang of 14 took that option off the table in this situation. That's the new reality in the Senate regarding nominees.

Again, some of the 7 GOP members had indicated their willingness to use the "constitutional option" in the event the Dems filibustered without good cause. A qualified SCOTUS nominee is likely that kind of good cause.

2,369 posted on 10/03/2005 12:16:04 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2298 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
Again, some of the 7 GOP members had indicated their willingness to use the "constitutional option" in the event the Dems filibustered without good cause. A qualified SCOTUS nominee is likely that kind of good cause.

And "good cause" was spelled out by the Dem members, as I noted - and would allow filibustering over preceived extremism. To the Dems, any professed originalist is an extremist. Rogers had to couch his words very carefully to get around that. Miers doesn't have a judicial history for the Dems to attack her with.

2,371 posted on 10/03/2005 12:17:59 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2369 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson