Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
So do you read that as Miers being a liberal Dem? Or a conservative pro-life Dem?

Either way you cut it, she identified most closely with the Democrats as late as 1988.

2,233 posted on 10/03/2005 10:55:52 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2227 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
Either way you cut it, she identified most closely with the Democrats as late as 1988.

As did many Southern conservatives...

2,239 posted on 10/03/2005 10:57:23 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2233 | View Replies ]

To: NittanyLion; dirtboy
Either way you cut it, she identified most closely with the Democrats as late as 1988.

OK - can we put this to bed one way or the other? I thought Rush said the Dem donor was not the right Miers. Did she or didn't she? Do we even know that for sure?

2,241 posted on 10/03/2005 10:57:44 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2233 | View Replies ]

To: NittanyLion
Either way you cut it, she identified most closely with the Democrats as late as 1988.

I think that's a big cause for concern. In the wake of the Reagan revolution she was a Democrat?

That hints to me that her views may have been colored by self interest, and that she saw the Democratic path as better for her in Texas. Will she bend her views to preserve her reputation in the media?

Dirtboy is right, we don't know yet, but my reading of the tea leaves is not giving me a good feeling...

2,256 posted on 10/03/2005 11:03:13 AM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson