[faithincowboys]

What are you talking about. The Left was calling Roberts gay despite the fact that he's married with two kids. He wouldn't be on the court if he were single and childless. Face reality, it's hard to be a pro-family, pro-life SC justice whose going to rollback courtimposed social liberalism if you never married or had kids.

[conservativebabe]

Wow, triple post, impressive. ;)

[confederacy of dunces]

What are you talking about. The Left was calling Roberts gay despite the fact that he's married with two kids. He wouldn't be on the court if he were single and childless. Face reality, it's hard to be a pro-family, pro-life SC justice whose going to rollback courtimposed social liberalism if you never married or had kids.

What I am talking about is that maybe, just maybe, the nominee never found her "right person" to marry. Or maybe the love of her life was killed in a tragic accident or something. The point is, what does that have to do with how she reads the Constitution?

For the record, I disagree with your statement that Roberts would not be on the court if he were married or childless.