???
just a second..
OK
Hit Play. ;-)
Posted on 10/02/2005 8:21:17 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has launched his fall offensive to turn the polls around, pass key reforms and regain momentum. The stakes are high and both sides are spending every dime to influence voter and pundit opinion. But Arnold would be wise to set aside his recent tactics and learn instead from the California tribal experience.
The strange journey taken by California's Indian tribes is a profound lesson about how far and fast the popular can fall in the realm of public opinion.
In 2000, the tribes were granted permission to erect casinos in California, thanks to voters driven in large part by guilt over historic treatment of Indians. The tribes began reaping vast profits and now rival Las Vegas for income. A monthly income of $30,000 for every man, woman and child in a gaming tribe is no longer big news.
But the once-popular tribes earned the enmity of California voters by getting greedy. They squabbled to eject members from tribes so the remaining members wouldn't have to share. Battles erupted over bloodlines; some families dug up grandma to provide ancestral DNA.
Worse, the tribes abandoned their campaign promise of casinos only on "Indian land." Today, "Indian land" is any land the staggeringly rich gaming tribes can buy with acquiescence from politicians.
Arnold is now mired in the same situation that tarred the tribes' reputation, even though he has accomplished more in two years than Gray Davis did in five (workers' comp reform, budget reductions, slashing the car tax, killing driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, stimulating private sector job growth, vetoing terrible laws passed by the Legislature). Despite this, Schwarzenegger's incessant fundraising evokes the same greedy grasping we saw from the tribes. He also plays directly into the hands of journalists engaged in the sort of blatant bias I've come to expect when an imperfect politician is also Republican.
Again, look to the tribes. They made the same basic mistakes. In 2003 and again in 2004, the tribes assumed the public wouldn't care about the slime factor in massive campaign donating. After all, the tribes were popular (and, by God, they were owed). In 2003, the tribes poured millions into Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante's campaign for governor. But instead of getting their pro-casino man elected, the tribes were repudiated by voters, who saw Bustamante as the tribes' stooge.
Then, in 2004, normally big-hearted California voters stood in line to vote against further acquiescence to Indian gaming, as Proposition 70 went down to big defeat.
Not surprisingly, money and greed are also why we need reform. California's deficit, lingering at several billion dollars per year, was caused in large part by insatiable California government unions, who control the Legislature like floppy puppets on Sesame Street. Government unions, with their huge lobbying offices in Sacramento, hammered the Legislature into backing billions of dollars in unaffordable spending programs that — surprise, surprise — employ hordes of new union workers. Every time a program grows, so does the size and power of a union. Who cares if the program even works?
With Arnold in the doghouse just like the tribes, what's a governor to do?
Jonathan Wilcox, adjunct professor at USC's Annenberg School for Communications and a consultant to Congressman Darrell Issa during the recall, has given me spot-on predictions of how Arnold would stumble this year. Now he says Arnold needs a powerful theme "that comes more from sorrow than from anger. He has to fight on the proposition that we the people of California can fight the system, and he has to convince the people that they — not him, or his star power or his money — but only they can change California."
Instead, Schwarzenegger repeats his awful, sing-song speech on special interests. I tune him out — and I am into politics. It's time the governor considered the intriguing idea of the "sorrow" theme. Even the word perks up my interest. "For the next two weeks," Wilcox suggests, "the governor should grab his veto pen and take it on the road while he vetoes bad laws. To bring the enormous problems of Sacramento to voters, who he is asking to make this enormous leap … he should veto the job killer bills while in the Central Valley and Southern California, and he should veto the bills that frustrate home-building while in the Inland Empire. And when he vetoes the education bills — well, he can go almost anywhere in the state to make that point."
Essentially, Wilcox is suggesting that the governor abandon his annoying chants and start giving intelligent voters a detailed picture that directly involves them. Unlike the tribes, the governor isn't in it personally for money. But by the same token, voters are having trouble seeing true reform — amid all those piles of cash.
Please, God.
Don't let Ahnold sing again.
So9
As plain as the nose on your face, but are the tax payers blind?
He loves social programs and made that known from the get go. and what supports them,, tax dollars. :-\
It's not over until Arnold sings.
chances are Ahnold will not be BACK again as governor unless he can get people to understand that he is the only answer in fighting the looney left in CaliFORNyah. Problem is, he can't get his message out. With the unions hammering him with commercials (god knows how much money they are spending), he'll need to respond soon and fast otherwise he's toast.
???
just a second..
OK
Hit Play. ;-)
Maria is the Governor of California, not Arnold.
Ahh!!! So she is the one sodomizing Arnold with his cigars!
Ewwwwwwww.
Are you saying the majority of Californian's want licenses for illegal aliens (vetoed by Arnold), marriage between gays (vetoed by Arnold), jobs leaving the state due to hugh Workers' comp (addressed by Arnold), Unions calling the shots and supporting crooked dem politicians (Arnold is addressing this)... he has been fighting the gaming dollars from the beginning, too... I could go on, but basically, I think he's getting a bum rap and if I was still living in California I'd be actively supporting him... especially since the alternative appears to be Beatty or Reiner.
All rhose steroids may have necessitated such a radical possibility..
not sure if you misread my post. All I was commenting on is that Arnold needs to do a better job of countering the unions if he wants a chance. I think many californians are just too braindead to care about anything other than who they will pick up this weekend in a bar and who will score them their drugs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.