And I once again thank the Good Lord I live in South Carolina where we have no use for foolishness like this. Am I saying South Carolina is devoid of "celebrities?" Yes I am!
"Newton said any journalists sued under the new law would likely challenge it as unconstitutional because it treats them more harshly than other Californians"
No, it treats their ACTIONS harshly.
It's not because they're 'journalists', it's because of what they do as journalists.
"Newton said any journalists sued under the new law would likely challenge it as unconstitutional because it treats them more harshly than other Californians."
They could always define it as a hate crime.
There is NO need for an anti-parrazzi law.
All they have to do is remove the unconsitutional laws that make it illegal for a person to protect him/herself.
If somebody harrasses me or mine with a camera - they EAT the camera. Quick and just retribution.
No sane and honorable person can refute that. No need for cops, scumbag lawyers nor their MASTERS in black robes.
Trolling for votes from the Hollywood community.
When it comes time for a political statement, mostly against Bush, the Hollywad elites beg for a camera.
Half the time its the hollywood moron, flipping off the paparazzi or egging them on. What a worthless bill by this RINO governor
I think this was necessary. It's one thing to have your picture taken but quite another to be "bumped" in traffic by a phtog or cut off causing accidents just cause the photog thinks a celeb is "fair game". It's begining to get dangerous.
And I once again thank the Good Lord I live in South Carolina where we have no use for foolishness like this. Am I saying South Carolina is devoid of "celebrities?" Yes I am!