Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mcgiver38
Even so, every F-14 air crew member without hesitation said they are ready to transition to the more modern and nimble Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet,

Because its that or find another job.

The Tomcat has never lost an air to air combat sim to an F18.

It was too big for the deck space, and required two to fly it. F18 was smaller and required 1 pilot. But the fist thing the Navy did was increase the size of the F18 and go to a two seat version.

13 posted on 10/01/2005 12:21:47 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: konaice; oyez; Khurkris; wildcatf4f3; Ramius; Spktyr; BIGLOOK; Doofer; F14 Pilot; mcgiver38; ...
The following article basically states that the F/A-18 is simply not able to come close to filling the shoes of the venerable Tomcat. The article goes into some depth on the reasons behind the Hornet and SuperHornet basically falling far short of the F-14 Tomcat. Far short.

It seems the only Tomcats flying will be those with Iranian colors. Oh, and I just loved the proposals for the QuickStrike, the SuperTomCat 21 and the AttackSuperTomCat 21, variants that were supposed to make the TomCat have a new lease of life (and make it even mroe lethal than it already ways). The AttackSuperTomcat21 -AST21- would have been basically bad-@$$. With twice the range of the F-14D, and note the F-14D has far greater range than any Hornet or SuperHornet that ever flew -and with capabilities that would have been second only to the F-22 in A2A, and unsurpassed by any fighter in the air2mud role. Obviously they cancelled since the TomCat had to die (had the SuperTomcat 21 come out several things would have happened ....for one there would have been no need for a SuperHornet, and secondly the JSF project would have gone the way of the A12 project. Thus it was a political stinky-poo and had to be cancelled).

Here is a drawing of the then-proposed ST21 SuperTomcat:

And here is an article questioning the prudence of replacing the TomCat with the SuperHornet. This is a rather interesting article:

http://www.flightjournal.com/articles/f14f18/f14f18_1.asp

16 posted on 10/01/2005 12:38:50 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: konaice
Sec Def Dick Cheney pulled the plug on the F-14, but the F-18 is, and was, a boondoggle. How many full developments does it represent?
  1. F-17
  2. F-18
  3. F-14E/F (actually a whole new plane)
Just for the F-18 development money we could have continued building the F-14 for another twenty years.
56 posted on 10/01/2005 4:05:53 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson