To: GSlob; ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; arete; ..
[GSlob:] It belongs not in a biology class but in a theology class The question is to whom the schools belong? To the people or to the cast of scientists who follow the religion of science/reason/progress in Hegelian fashion? The logical and full implementation of this scientific theocracy was Soviet Union.
I believe that God could have created the world using evolution and the laws of nature appointed by Him. (And He even could have change the past if it pleased Him. He is the Boss.)
But if the Fundamentalist Protestants want to put their literal ideas into schools in the districts they are in majority WHO has right to deny them their right.
There is no science nor Hegel nor Marxism in the Constitution.
26 posted on
09/30/2005 6:40:09 PM PDT by
A. Pole
(" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! Bazaar Akbar! ")
To: A. Pole
Should Muslims be allowed to teach their views on creation in school districts where they have 50% +1 students?
To: A. Pole
"There is no science nor Hegel nor Marxism in the Constitution."
There is no ID in the Constitution either. And the decisions of certain type [like deciding what is 2x2] are not subject to any democratic, constitutional or majoritarian control. In empirical natural sciences [like biochemistry, medicine, astrophysics, etc] there are wide areas of scientific consensus - and to challenge such a consensus one better be a top-flight scientist in the field, and not an ignoramus off the street. Such a barrier to entry might be undemocratic, but so what? Evolution happens to be one of such areas.
If you come down with appendicitis [not that I wish it on you, although it might learn you a bit] - you will be seeking a treatment which is a result of consensus in medicine on how the appendicitis is to be treated - and you will go to a conventional surgeon, and not to a faith healer with his/her/its incantations, charms and amulets. But then again, going to a faith healer might indeed learn you...
48 posted on
09/30/2005 7:33:17 PM PDT by
GSlob
To: A. Pole
"There is no science nor Hegel nor Marxism in the Constitution"
I suggest you read Article 1, section 8, line 8. You have not Idea what the Constitution says do you?
50 posted on
09/30/2005 7:37:16 PM PDT by
Mylo
( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
To: A. Pole; GSlob; ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; ...
If you wish to preach theology, then do so as an elective, optional class. Creationism is a protestant invention that is not supported by the Orthodox, Catholic or Lutherin churches and is not Scripturally sound.
Orthodoxy and Creationalism
135 posted on
10/03/2005 10:49:11 AM PDT by
jb6
(The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson