To: blowfish
"Since they haven't offered a particle of evidence that ID is anything more than psuedo-intellectual wankery, all we have to consider is the nature of the alleged designer."
Your very existence lends volumes of support to the ID hypothesis.
Stop worrying so much about the religious implications of ID and open your eyes to the astonishing refutation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics that might have occured so many millennia ago
To: RightInEastLansing
Stop worrying so much about the religious implications of ID and open your eyes to the astonishing refutation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics that might have occured so many millennia ago What? Back up the turnip truck and explain that one. I missed something.
100 posted on
09/30/2005 3:25:42 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: RightInEastLansing
open your eyes to the astonishing refutation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics that might have occured so many millennia ago
You know the second law applies to a closed system with no input of energy from the outside. Take a step outside and look at the big bright yellow thing in the sky. Oh and real quick like what are the 1st and 3rd laws. If you can't tell without a google search then you are just a dupe spewing creationist talking points (and old stale ones at that)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson