[atlaw]

So what's your methodology for discerning design? Be precise.

[Louis Foxwell]

So what's your methodology for discerning design? Be precise.

The issue is not a methodology but an approach. The assumption of chance is replaced with the assumption of design. Darwinists relegate change to nondirected happenstance. That is a bias. I recommend a different bias more likely to explain phenomenon.

[JCEccles]

So what's your methodology for discerning design? Be precise.

How do you know this contains information, and that isn't just a random design generated by natural forces of erosion?

Unless you embrace principles of intelligent design, you cannot know. If you are an evolutionist you will not even attempt to entertain an alternative solution implying intelligence.

Indeed, you will insist that the government silence your fellow citizens who disagree with you.