That's interesting. There are many "design" supporters on this thread. Would all of those who are indeed "practicing scientists" please identify yourselves, and your relevant credentials and areas of research?
Your comment reveals one of many reasons that your side is losing the argument. The design folks keep on making their case, presenting evidence, continuing research. The Darwinians tend to rely almost exclusively on the ad hominem fallacy and never tap into that mythical mountain of evidence they often claim to have.
You'd think that so-called men of science would try and make a scientific case in support of evolution.