Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

Yeah, that will be a fun one to explain. How does a moon, even a small one like this, absorb an impact capable of cratering 75% of its diameter and NOT shatter? The size of the crater versus the size of the moon seems impossible.


22 posted on 09/30/2005 11:37:50 AM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Arthalion
Flying objects out in space have no weight only the gravity of the body they hit imparts weightiness to the projectile, so an impact would not be as shattering hitting a small chunk of stuff like this as it would if it hit the earth for instance.
33 posted on 09/30/2005 11:43:48 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (!...The Confederate States of America rises again...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Arthalion

It looks like a huge sink hole, not a crater. Notice some of the smaller craters are stretched into ellipses along the edge of the big "crater". These must have been existing and elongated as the ground sank. There are no new craters along this edge.


44 posted on 09/30/2005 11:55:15 AM PDT by idkfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Arthalion

Yeah, that will be a fun one to explain. How does a moon, even a small one like this, absorb an impact capable of cratering 75% of its diameter and NOT shatter? The size of the crater versus the size of the moon seems impossible.

From totally stuck-in-stupid about astronomy, but couldn't this irregularly shaped moon be a cast-off after it was formed on a larger surface?


83 posted on 09/30/2005 1:11:15 PM PDT by purpleland (Vigilance and Valour!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson