[DBeers]

My point exactly. However, neither you, nor your fellow Wahabbists, nor Opus Dei, nor the good Sisters of Charity make the rules for that club. God does.

LOL -you have no point!!! Your argument is completely a moral relative argument -hence, without basis!

On what basis -upon what authority, do YOU attempt to disparage others as Wahabbists -on what basis do you declare that Opus Dei, or the good Sisters of Charity make the rules for the "club" -regardless YOU even mentioning specifically what rules YOU have problem with -what rules you implicate ambiguously with the certainty of moral relative conviction...

Other than hot air -what are you communicating specifically? The Church teaches clearly YET you reference no Church teaching? Should any chance putting their faith in the message of another simply because he bellows loudly?

You sound an awful lot like luther -a protestant...

[markedman]

Re: "You sound an awful lot like luther -a protestant..."

Luther was a Roman Catholic who did not set about with any intention of forming a new religion. In Luther's time Rome was corrupt and avaricious and it was the barons who helped in that regard.

Re: "On what basis -upon what authority, do YOU attempt to disparage others as Wahabbists -on what basis do you declare that Opus Dei, or the good Sisters of Charity make the rules for the "club" -regardless YOU even mentioning specifically what rules YOU have problem with -what rules you implicate ambiguously with the certainty of moral relative conviction...

Pick a rule or teaching: from no meat on Friday to Limbo (remember Limbo?) What I have a problem with is that the supposed 'defenders' of the church act decidedly unChristian in their treatment of their fellow man. But that's really not my problem, but yours and your fellow Wahabbists, because you will have some serious explaining to do when your time comes.