Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852
How do you suppose he came to the conclusion it was 20 million years old?

I think he probably used scientific dating techniques. Not having read the study, I have no idea which techniques he used, but if you're interested, your local university library probably subscribes to Paleontology and I'm sure the study goes over its methodology quite sufficiently.

49 posted on 09/30/2005 9:44:19 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
The dating of the amber is published in Science, Vol 273, Issue 5283, 1850-1852 , 27 September 1996. It's basically stratigraphic/palaeogeographic, although NMR results on the exomethylene signals are in approximate agreement.

Abstract:The age and depositional history of Dominican amber-bearing deposits have not been well constrained. Resinites of different ages exist in Hispaniola, but all of the main amberiferous deposits in the Dominican Republic (including those famous for yielding biological inclusions) were formed in a single sedimentary basin during the late Early Miocene through early Middle Miocene (15 to 20 million years ago), according to available biostratigraphic and paleogeographic data. There is little evidence for extensive reworking or redeposition, in either time or space. The brevity of the depositional interval (less than 5 million years) provides a temporal benchmark that can be used to calibrate rates of molecular evolution in amber taxa.

61 posted on 09/30/2005 9:52:23 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson