To: Jarhead1957
It seems something is funny when a Grand Jury Foreman feels the need to 'go public' and justify himself.
Don't most Grand Juries treasure their privacy and anonymity?
3 posted on
09/30/2005 7:48:42 AM PDT by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: GaltMeister
"Don't most Grand Juries treasure their privacy and anonymity?"
Yep.
5 posted on
09/30/2005 7:49:58 AM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: GaltMeister
Isn't it illegal for the members of a grand jury to talk? Or does that end in Texas when they are no longer in session?
6 posted on
09/30/2005 7:51:04 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: GaltMeister
"Don't most Grand Juries treasure their privacy and anonymity?"Considering the hearings are supposed to be secret, I'd think so.
Unless he's a democrat.
12 posted on
09/30/2005 8:05:22 AM PDT by
norton
To: GaltMeister
I'm sure he has had calls from people, as he felt he needed to justify their actions, or he has heard the questions that have been raised on TV. Anyway he came forward.
I walked in as he started, and missed his name. I looked at the Grand Jury papers, and cannot tell you his name. His signature is almost a scribble.
13 posted on
09/30/2005 8:07:33 AM PDT by
Jarhead1957
(Semper Fi)
To: GaltMeister
sounds like the Jury Foreman wants to be on the witness stand...
25 posted on
09/30/2005 8:21:20 AM PDT by
pointsal
To: GaltMeister
I was on a grand jury once and the answer to your question is: yes, completely. Exposing your identity may lead to possible mistrial.
39 posted on
09/30/2005 8:53:35 AM PDT by
Big Guy and Rusty 99
(Liberals are the feces that is produced when shame eats too much stupidity!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson