Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jarhead1957

This also just in...the Jury Foreman in Earle's bogus indictment of Kay Bailey Hutchinson also felt they had compelling evidence...just prior to the case being tossed out before it even went to trial.


11 posted on 09/30/2005 8:04:07 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frankjr
This also just in...the Jury Foreman in Earle's bogus indictment of Kay Bailey Hutchinson also felt they had compelling evidence...just prior to the case being tossed out before it even went to trial.

Actually the case did go to trial. The Judge wouldn't let Earle drop it. Earle had no admissable evidence to present and the Judge instructed the jury they must return a verdict of not guilty. The Judge was protecting Kay's interest by insuring that she was found not guilty, not just case dismissed.

17 posted on 09/30/2005 8:12:05 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson