LOL! No, you actually just proved, in action, the truth of that which I had previously posted.
When you jump to name calling, you lose all pretense of objectivity.
Actually, calling something by its true name is the first step in achieving objectivity. Which is why ID must be called what it is, religion; and evolution called what it is, science.
Moreover, it is a lie to call a scared, ignorant, brainwashed man "brave," or "learned" or "thoughtful," simply because you agree with the superstitions he espouses and prefers. (In fact, it is, in some sense, inhumane to pretend that he is not scared, ignorant and brainwashed, because it strips from him one of the avenues from which he might effectuate the change he needs.)
Similarly, it is a lie to call the result of countless hours of researching, theorizing, thinking, working, investigating, postulating, and debating which has occurred on the science of evolution -- and the literally millions of data points which confirm the theory -- "wrong," "incorrect" or a "lie," simply because you think it conflicts with the superstitions you espouse and prefer.
There is perhaps one more thing - though this may be spitting in the wind...
there actually is a difference between speaking truthfully and name calling.
best to you, ampu