To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Condorman; balrog666; ...
288 posted on
09/30/2005 5:16:27 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: PatrickHenry
Dover attorneys also argue that because intelligent design doesn't specifically identify the designer, it's not religiously motivated. ID proponents are not going through all this effort because they want to teach Native American creation stories or the saga of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
289 posted on
09/30/2005 5:26:57 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: PatrickHenry
But Pennock pointed to examples where its supporters have named the designer. And he is God. He cited examples of articles written by Phillip Johnson, known as the father of the intelligent design movement.
Have to wonder if he mentioned Jonathan "I-became-a-biologist-to-destroy-Darwin-for-Father-Moon" Wells.
291 posted on
09/30/2005 6:24:09 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson