Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Condorman; balrog666; ...
We have enough threads for one day, so I won't post this as a new one, but I think this article is very good:

Witness (Robert Pennock) bashes intelligent design.

288 posted on 09/30/2005 5:16:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Dover attorneys also argue that because intelligent design doesn't specifically identify the designer, it's not religiously motivated.

ID proponents are not going through all this effort because they want to teach Native American creation stories or the saga of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

289 posted on 09/30/2005 5:26:57 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
But Pennock pointed to examples where its supporters have named the designer. And he is God.

He cited examples of articles written by Phillip Johnson, known as the father of the intelligent design movement.

Have to wonder if he mentioned Jonathan "I-became-a-biologist-to-destroy-Darwin-for-Father-Moon" Wells.
291 posted on 09/30/2005 6:24:09 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson