Both of you finnaly get my point. where are the parents? and it should be up to them to insure that their daughter doesn't have sex not our nanny state court system
Have you considered the possibility that maybe the parents wanted the judge to include these conditions? When I saw that the judge said the juvenile wasn't to do these things "as long as she is living with her parents and attending school," it made me suspect that the parents had complained about these activities and wanted help from the court in enforcing their rules. That happens all the time. Some kids are just beyond their parents control and out of desperation parents ask the court to step in and help. I would not be surprised at all to learn that all of this about sex and tattoos and so on came from the parents. How else would the judge have known about all of these things going on in the child's life? Most likely the judge ordered exactly what the parents wanted him to order. If that was the case, would you still have a problem with it?