Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiteGuy

"Enlistment would probably skyrocket knowing that they would be used to protect our soil."

Unlikely.

"Shoot on sight? Not necessary, land mines? maybe"

If you're willing to use landmines, then you're willing to use deadly force without exception.

And for those who advocate landmines...I double-dog-dare you to view up close and personal the consequences of someone stepping on one. Most of the armchair commandos here would barf to the point of dry heaves and then some if they did.


86 posted on 09/30/2005 9:07:08 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
"Enlistment would probably skyrocket knowing that they would be used to protect our soil."
Unlikely.

That's your opinion

87 posted on 09/30/2005 9:11:16 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson