Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NJ_gent
For instance, Microsoft's new CLI ('Monad') looks incredible. I haven't had time to download what's available of it thus far, but I'm looking forward to exploring its capabilities. From what I've seen and read of it, it looks to be a step or two above and beyond any currently existing shell for Linux or *nix.

But that's proprietary. Yet, you'll not accept office 12 XML documents because they require agreement to a royalty free license?

224 posted on 09/30/2005 12:02:44 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: for-q-clinton
"But that's proprietary."

I didn't say the government of the state of Massachusits should adopt it as a standard; I said I wanted to take a look at it because I was personally interested in its capabilities.

"Yet, you'll not accept office 12 XML documents because they require agreement to a royalty free license?"

That's a strawman argument because I never said I wouldn't. I was commenting on the policy decisions of a state government, but you already knew that.
227 posted on 09/30/2005 12:23:17 PM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson