To: NJ_gent
For instance, Microsoft's new CLI ('Monad') looks incredible. I haven't had time to download what's available of it thus far, but I'm looking forward to exploring its capabilities. From what I've seen and read of it, it looks to be a step or two above and beyond any currently existing shell for Linux or *nix. But that's proprietary. Yet, you'll not accept office 12 XML documents because they require agreement to a royalty free license?
224 posted on
09/30/2005 12:02:44 PM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
"But that's proprietary."
I didn't say the government of the state of Massachusits should adopt it as a standard; I said I wanted to take a look at it because I was personally interested in its capabilities.
"Yet, you'll not accept office 12 XML documents because they require agreement to a royalty free license?"
That's a strawman argument because I never said I wouldn't. I was commenting on the policy decisions of a state government, but you already knew that.
227 posted on
09/30/2005 12:23:17 PM PDT by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson