"This is a story which Republicans should back away from. This is a can of worms you don't want opened. Rumsfeld is doing the right thing, and he could use our support."
The can is already opened, the American public opened it when they elected the Clintons and apparently there were far too many publicans that got into bed with the sleaze balls.
Just HOW BAD IS IT?????
And why's that? Please share with the group.
"This is a can of worms you don't want opened."
Ooooooooooooooo. mysterious. give me a break.
Any government that only pulls an Assistant Secretary of State's clearance for 3 years after he steals secrets in his socks, and then pulls a 20 year active Colonel's clearance for life after he blows the lid on this, means a government that isn't fit to run the nation. Blow it out your pukin a$$. Let the chips fall where they may. I guess you were there when Kennedy decided to not help the cubans overthrow castro, because it was too seeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEeensitive.
Able Danger, OKC, TWA800, etc...
Big Rummy / "W" fan here but I'd like to know WTH is going on too.
That's interesting. We should back away from trying to find out why terrorists were identified on Clinton's watch and nothing was done about it? We should back away from wanting to understand why the murderers of Americans were allowed to do their work while the government *knew* they were here?
Really.
I have to assume, Pukin, that people in the Pentagon are putting out the word to anyone who'll listen that this is a story no one wants made public. I have to assume that's folks like Podhoretz and Krauthammer are saying this is not a story to be looked into. Because sources in the Pentagon are telling them that. Now, if the reason is that the Bush Administration is covering something up, that's not a good enough reason for not letting the story come out. It would have to be something on the order of the downfall of the Republic to justify not letting this information be made public.
It doesn't matter what the Democrats do with the information, because they are flakey to begin with and will simply make up stuff to accuse the Administration with. They've been doing that for five years. So I don't see any justification for not having public hearings. I think Clinton was a complete failure in dealing with terrorism, despite whatever myth he and the Democrats are trying to create now.
Oh sure! I always heed the word of a poster on the Internet, especially one with a catchy monicker like Pukin' Dog.
You should've reminded the audience that you own a Hummer! That really impresses folks.
Now tell us why your post means more than the cost of dirt, if you can be bothered to do so.
So who's worried?