Posted on 09/29/2005 6:37:50 PM PDT by strategofr
Biden would accuse a sandwich of a cover up if he thought it would get him some TV time.
"And in this case, we need not proble sources and methods. We need only examine the decision process leading to destroying data and to failure to communicate threats to domestic investigative agencies e.g. FBI."
Completely correct.
"See a doctor."
LOL!
"We would (and incidently DO) rally around him when he makes mistakes."
I agree. And the damage to Clinton would be much greater than to Bush. Normally, you could say "Clinton" is in the past, so less important. But we have another Clinton coming up, so dealing with the previous one is vital.
It depends. Did the Clinton enablers help cause 9/11? If so, I don't want Hillary to have the opportunity to have more Clinton enablers in power to help cause another 9/11...
I look at this Able Danger thing as a big circle.
Yep...
Heh, you are the one that wants to restrict their "choice" in electing CongressCritters to folks who are not currently holding that office, or have ever held it (not sure what you meant by limiting to a single term, that is ever or consecutively). Not that I didn't pretty much agree. :)
If most people could usually tell when the Democrats were lying, they wouldn't get away with it, but they too often do.
Even if they don't pay much attention until just before the elections, they still vote on their perceptions of the threats to their wallets, security and a distance last, their freedom. Those perceptions are formed by what they hear, see and read when they aren't necessarily paying much attention, as well as when they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.