[SirJohnBarleycorn]

if at this point, his purpose is still to chase the "Plame name game" - he should have just closed it up months ago.

Agreed, but it may be that how Miller answers his questions on the Plame name game will help him reach a conclusion on whether there are any obstruction or perjury charges that can be feasibly pursued, whether against Miller or others.

[Christopher Lincoln]

I think that Fitzgerald has given up the idea of indicting anybody for "leaking" Plame's identity. His focus now is on perjury. I gather he thinks somebody has testified falsely to the grand jury, and that Miller's testimony can prove it. The only way that could be true is that the testimony concerned something said to Miller, either by the witness or by a third person in his presence. I say something said to Miller, not by her, since could not have had an obligation to withhold what she herself said.