Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123
Ask Bill Keller if they were told that Miller was going to be indicted on Monday if she didn't testify tomorrow and watch them squirm. The Times is pulling a Sid Blumenthal to try to coverup the fact that Miller was on her way to a criminal contempt indictment on Monday and an extended jail stay for at least another 6 months.

Now that makes senses

158 posted on 09/30/2005 5:14:39 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1
'Now that makes senses"

Not to me. I'm so confused, nothing makes "sense" to me. Well, I think, for some reason, Miller did not want to testify. She conviently used the excuse that she didn't think she had Livvy's waiver, that his blanket waiver didn't apply to her. Remember Matt Cooper did that same dance, but he cleared it up before he went to jail. Why didn't Miller do the same? The judge in the case back in July told her that her source's waiver did allow her to testify, that's verified in one of the papers today. I think Miller wanted to do the jailed journalist schtick. It surely made her famous, didn't it?

If it turns out Miller spent all this time in jail because her lawyer Floyd Abrams advised her badly, that in itself will be a triumpth for our legal justice system! Abrams needs to be taken down a peg or two.

162 posted on 09/30/2005 5:27:17 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ God Bless President Bush As the MSM and Democrats Seek To Destroy Him.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson