Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
I guess they don't remember the courts track record and the many times the people's will got slapped down before.

So...he should have *not* vetoed the bill? I don't get where you are coming from here. He did what was in his power to do.
46 posted on 09/29/2005 4:58:29 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative til I die

I don't think it really mattered what he did today or Gastric Nuisance did early this year, both decisions were and are mute and are for political gain only, imo.


As things sit now, it is up to the court,, he could have let it set on his desk and done nothing. I don't recall it haveing overwhelming support or that it as vetoproof.

If I am wrong, correct me. Please.

In gfact, he may have effectively killed any possibilities of gaining support from gay folks for his initiaitves by acting as he has, so which is more important long-term?


50 posted on 09/29/2005 5:03:58 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative til I die; NormsRevenge

He didn't do it in exactly the right way. And besides the debt and bonds and blah, blah . . .


100 posted on 09/29/2005 6:57:12 PM PDT by republicofdavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson