Posted on 09/29/2005 3:31:41 PM PDT by hipaatwo
The more I read about Earle, the more I think he is literally unbalanced. This is intolerable behavior.
Your links are transposed (first link is the address, second link is the form), but thanks for the info. I have put them in my file for posting on other threads.
LOL!
Chris Wallace is a big lefty like his dad......I hate watching Fox on Sunday.
I know what you mean...
I usually watch the repeat in the afternoon...mostly for the roundtable...
I heard the producer of this movie this morning on KLBJAM radio. He said, among other things, that Earle truly believes that he is out to save democracy.
The movie is expected out in 3 weeks. (Is this why Earle lept into the spotlight right now?)
The movie's name "The Big Buy", is a reference to a crime. When asked repeatedly what they would do if DeLay was acquitted and therefore a crime had not been committed, he just said that the movie ended at the indictment.
He did say that he was surprised that Earle had pushed for the indictment; it was his understanding (from Earle) that Delay would not be indicted, and in fact, they were going to have to refilm the ending, since it did end in an indictment. Presumably, the ending up to that point just left the viewer with the impression that a crime of some sort had been committed by Delay and the movie would end with that impression.
They have been filming this movie for 2 years.
Two can play his game. Where is a conservative prosecutor that will go after Earle and film him going to jail? I'm willing to bet he has a lot more to hide than Tom Delay does. Pelosi and a few others should start worrying as well, remember the scrambling to correct their records when this first started. Correcting isn't good enough anymore, if Delay has to pay so should they all.
Since the movie ALREADY had an indictment for the ending, it seems like Ronnie Earle is a Co_CONSPIRATOR!
No, I might not have made that clear in my effort to remember everything from this morning - they are now re-doing the ending to include the indictment.
I think the movie making is not an effort to make a successful, money-making film. It is a way to keep the heat on Ronnie Earle so he doesn't let up, even though his case is flimsy. After all, they have him thinking he's the star of a movie, but he knows it won't ever be shown unless he takes this thing as far as he can.
The people financing this film behind the scenes don't care if it makes money. That's not the main objective. If it makes money, or even reduces their costs a little, that's just gravy.
Just my opinion.
The obvious purpose of the movie is to convict Delay. That's what movies are for, to influence social behavior and rewrite history. Sheesh
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.