Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Developing Nations Want Internet Brought Under UN Control
CNS NEWS ^ | September 29, 2005 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 09/29/2005 10:28:04 AM PDT by JustAnotherOkie

The politically charged question of who will control the Internet in the future is dominating preparatory talks ahead of a global Internet summit.

At the same time, a controversy over the choice of a host nation for the November gathering has focused attention on autocratic regimes' attempts to clamp down on the medium.

The U.N.-organized World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) is to be hosted by Tunisia despite campaigners' accusations of press freedom violations in the North African Muslim state.

Rights groups have recorded violations in Tunisia including the blocking of websites and police monitoring of cyber cafes - the very type of behavior that makes them nervous about allowing rights-abusing governments, through the U.N., to have a say in future Internet policy.

Historically, the U.S. has overseen the Internet. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, set up under the U.S. Commerce Department, deals with such matters as assigning top-level and specific domain names and IP addresses.

Washington argues that while improvements in technical efficiency and transparency can be discussed, U.S. management of the Internet has been successful.

"The existing structures have worked effectively to make the Internet the highly robust and geographically diverse medium that it is today," the State Department's bureau of economic and business affairs said in a recent report. "The security and stability of the Internet must be maintained."

But developing nations, led by Brazil and Iran and supported by China, Cuba and others, are pressing for effective U.N. control.

At preparatory talks currently underway in Geneva, countries are broadly split between Western countries supportive of existing institutions, and developing nations wanting to end U.S. control - a situation the Chinese envoy called "undemocratic, unfair and unreasonable."

The latter group was boosted when the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG), a body set up to make proposals ahead of November's summit, stated in a report that "no single government should have a pre-eminent role in relation to international Internet governance."

The group suggested several possible models, including a Global Internet Council "anchored in the United Nations."

Such a body, "consisting of members from governments with appropriate representation from each region ... would take over the functions relating to international Internet governance currently performed by the Department of Commerce of the United States government," said the WGIG report, released in July.

Senator Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), who has delved into U.N. corruption, responded at the time by saying that "putting the U.N. in charge of one of the world's most important technological wonders and economic engines is out of the question."

"This proposal would leave the United States with no more say over the future of the Internet than Cuba or China - countries that have little or no commitment to the free flow of information," he said in a statement.

'Beyond comprehension'

Beijing is a leading proponent of U.N. supervision of the Internet. At a WGIG meeting in Geneva last June, the Chinese representative said: "We feel that the public policy issue of Internet should be solved jointly by the sovereign states in the U.N. framework."

"Where Internet resources now are managed by one government, in future it should be jointly managed by all governments," the envoy said.

But human rights campaigners worry about countries like China being involved in setting future Internet policy.

Reporters Without Frontiers, a media freedom watchdog, says China oversees the most far-reaching system of Internet censorship and email surveillance anywhere, and is also "the world's biggest prison for cyber-dissidents," more than 60 of whom are in jail.

Just this week China announced rules aimed at ensuring that online news sites only carry approved news.

Tunisia is another country where rights groups say press freedoms have deteriorated, and critics see in its choice as host country for the Internet summit an echo of Libya's 2003 selection to chair the U.N. Commission on Human Rights - another reason why the U.N. should not be given oversight of the Internet.

Reporters Without Borders said in a statement the U.N. decision to allow "a country that imprisons people for using the Internet [to host the summit] ... is beyond comprehension."

In a report released this week, a coalition of 14 media NGOs said Tunisia was unfit to hold the summit, accusing the government of taking steps aimed at stifling dissent ahead of the event.

They cited reports of a clampdown on the press and civil society, including the jailing of a human rights lawyer for posting critical comments online. Mohamed Abbou was sentenced to three and a half years' imprisonment for "incitement of the population to infringe the laws," they said.

Tunisia on Wednesday dismissed the report as "biased and inaccurate."

"Freedom of the Internet is a global challenge, that's why we are concerned about what will happen in November in Tunis," Vincent Brossel of Reporters Without Frontiers told Cybercast News Service from Paris earlier.

"If countries like China manage to get the Internet in their hands it will change absolutely all the rules," he said. "It's quite scary."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Too Bad for them. Just cut them off.
1 posted on 09/29/2005 10:28:09 AM PDT by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

My thoughts exactly.


2 posted on 09/29/2005 10:29:55 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

I picture a bunch of strings running through the jungle attached to tin cans...


3 posted on 09/29/2005 10:29:57 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

The "developing countries" can get bent sideways with a crowbar. The US developed the internet, we'll control it, thankyouVERYmuch!


4 posted on 09/29/2005 10:31:26 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

And in a related story, people in Hell want ice water.


5 posted on 09/29/2005 10:32:07 AM PDT by dfwgator (Flower Mound, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

"I picture a bunch of strings running through the jungle attached to tin cans..."


All your Tin Cans belong to us... ;)


6 posted on 09/29/2005 10:35:28 AM PDT by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

Firstly, democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on what's for dinner.

Secondly, democracy is a non-sequitur. The Internet was invented by the US (DARPA, in fact,) and is therefore the property of the US. The US has the right to operate the Internet. Other countries have the right to create and/or use whatever alternative they prefer, and call it whatever they like (I'd suggest "PoliticizedNet.")


7 posted on 09/29/2005 10:35:54 AM PDT by sourcery (Givernment: The way the average voter spells "government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie
The UN smells money and power. We KNOW how that affects the UN based on ALL past behavior.

Cut 'em off, kick 'em out of the U.S. dorm too.

8 posted on 09/29/2005 10:37:41 AM PDT by Johnny Crab (Who DAT says dem busses ain't good enough? They're not just FOR THE CHILDREN....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

this was covered yesterday...but I will ask the question again...why is the US still in the UN and why is the UN still in the US?????


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1492843/posts


9 posted on 09/29/2005 10:37:59 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

Just in time for Halloween?


10 posted on 09/29/2005 10:38:12 AM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie; dfwgator

11 posted on 09/29/2005 10:39:30 AM PDT by demkicker (Life has many choices. Eternity has only two. Which one have you chosen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie
"WE BUILT IT." "WE PAID FOR IT." "IT'S OURS!"
12 posted on 09/29/2005 10:43:52 AM PDT by dfwgator (Flower Mound, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I picture a bunch of strings running through the jungle attached to tin cans...

And the hubs and servers are interfaced through big spider webs.

13 posted on 09/29/2005 10:44:44 AM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Let them build their own,in about 800 years, if we help.


14 posted on 09/29/2005 10:46:20 AM PDT by Comus (Proud US taxpayer - supporting illegitimacy and sloth since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

The Internet is not currently under US "control". There are a number of root name servers outside the US. Another matter altogether is the fact that there's a lot of content which can be legally hosted only in the US nowadays. For example, explicitly racist sites are banned in all of Western Europe and cannot be hosted on European web servers.


15 posted on 09/29/2005 10:46:51 AM PDT by Truthsayer20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie
At the same time, a controversy over the choice of a host nation for the November gathering has focused attention on autocratic regimes' attempts to clamp down on the medium.

But developing nations, led by Brazil and Iran and supported by China, Cuba and others, are pressing for effective U.N. control.

Hold the &#%^ing meeting in Havana and put China in charge of the censoring.

"The existing structures have worked effectively to make the Internet the highly robust and geographically diverse medium that it is today," the State Department's bureau of economic and business affairs said in a recent report.

Which is what the developing world doesn't like and what the U.N. wants to effectively kill.

At preparatory talks currently underway in Geneva, countries are broadly split between Western countries supportive of existing institutions, and developing nations wanting to end U.S. control - a situation the Chinese envoy called "undemocratic, unfair and unreasonable."

Build your own damn version of the Internet and do it with your money.

16 posted on 09/29/2005 10:46:54 AM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie
China, Cuba, Tunisia, and all the other third world hell-holes around the world are perfectly free to band together and create a 'dictatornet' that they can have full and complete control over.

Perhaps the spam I get from china will decrease somewhat.

The United States built the net. Everyone else can screw off.

17 posted on 09/29/2005 10:47:20 AM PDT by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie
Why does everybody want what "you" have?

If they want an internet they control then let them make one. That way the average joe would have a choice. The real world wide web or the dictator controlled one.
18 posted on 09/29/2005 10:47:56 AM PDT by PeteB570
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

My exact thoughts.


19 posted on 09/29/2005 10:49:04 AM PDT by ├čudda├čudd (7 days - 7 ways "Guero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

I disagree. Their new strategery should be: WWN.FU.BS = WorldWideNuts.FrigYou.BullShiite


20 posted on 09/29/2005 10:49:29 AM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson