To: RadioAstronomer
(BTW this is a simple form of the equation and is only applied to point sources. Usually it is expressed as a vector equation) That reminds me of when I took physics, and we kept talking about an electric field around an infinite wire. I know it was presented that way in order to simplify the mathmatics, but I got so hung up on the impossibility of an infinite wire that I couldn't grasp the mathmatics. For me, it would have been better to present the equations with all the modifications necessary to describe the distortions of electric field at the wire ends, because I can believe a finite wire.
67 posted on
09/29/2005 6:08:52 AM PDT by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: exDemMom
72 posted on
09/29/2005 6:13:40 AM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: exDemMom
98 posted on
09/29/2005 6:55:02 AM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: exDemMom
That reminds me of when I took physics, and we kept talking about an electric field around an infinite wire. I know it was presented that way in order to simplify the mathmatics, but I got so hung up on the impossibility of an infinite wire that I couldn't grasp the mathmatics.
I had the good fortune to have an excellent physics professor. He talked about "an ecectric field around a wire, while for the moment, neglecting end effects."
560 posted on
10/04/2005 7:21:49 PM PDT by
NonLinear
(He's dead, Jim)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson