no, wolf.
1. I make a prediction, based on the fact that there ARE gaps in the record
2. ctd believes this means I have asserted that there is no fossil evidence of transitional species.
if you cannot comprehend this... well, that's par for the course for your side on these threads.
if you DO comprehend this, but misrepresent anyway... well, that ALSO is par for the course for your side on these threads
And exactly what are evolutionists looking for to 'fill in those gaps'?
I have another question based on your post, but I don't want to confuse you by asking you two questions in one post.