Seriously, you have severe reading comprehension problems.
Perhaps you are confusing a discussion we had on another thread where you referenced this Talk Origins Claim CA210: Evolution Predictions...from which I note:
#4. If evolution's low power to make future predictions keeps it from being a science, then some other fields of study cease to be sciences, too, especially archeology and astronomy.
I think you are the confused one. I have never referenced that page to you or anyone else. I agree that the statement is sensible. The natural world is an arena with untold billions of variables. To suggest that we have to work out the direction that future evolution will take to be taken seriously is frankly babyish.
Now, the admission from your source of evolution's low power to make future predictions is significant to me, though, obviously not to you.
I suppose we can disagree on the importance of evolution's low power to make future predictions, however, suffice it to say that your BOGUS "Shameless Trolling placemarker" is...well, bogus.
No it isn't, you have been shown numerous predictions made by the theory of evolution, yet you continue to shriek, "you cannot make me see." As usual no position is so stupid that RunningWolf is unprepared to support it if that involves rubbishing evolution.
To suggest that we have to work out the direction that future evolution will take to be taken seriously is frankly babyish.
Frankly Babyish - is that one of the million scientists...with name sounding like Frank? Look, if your standards for prediction don't include anything about the FUTURE, then we obviously have different standards. I can live with that.
By the way, read any good Nostradamus lately?