"Isn't that special. The evolutionists claim that the IDers can offer no positive proof of ID, but the evolutionists can't provide the same kind of proof for evolution. The fact is the IDers have offered plenty of evidence casting serious doubt on the ToE."
I didn't ask for "positive proof." I asked for evidence. The evidence for evolution is significant and growing. (If you throw out evolution, you also throw out the entire field of genetics and all of the biological sciences beyond the "that's a duck, this is a whale" descriptive level.)
The field of genetics would survive quite well without evolution. If anything, the field of genetics tends to discount the claims of evolution.