[connectthedots]

You said there were gaps in the ToE, including a lack of a fossil record supporting transitional forms. Those were your words.

I see you have no substantive evidence, so you resort you throw a temper tantrum like a spoiled brat.

[King Prout]

I typed:
predict that various "gaps" in the fossil record will be filled by the discovery of currently unknown fossils, and that the morphology of those fossils will be transitional between what came before and what came after? sure. I predict that.

you read:
there were gaps in the ToE, including a lack of a fossil record supporting transitional forms.

I was considering, for a brief moment, giving you an in-depth and considerate reply, explaining why there are gaps in the fossil record (having to do with the fact that the remains of the overwhelming majority of organisms do not get fossilized) and then showing you transitional cladograms of various evolutionary branches, but then I realized that if you are so benighted as to mistake my laughing at you for a temper tantrum, no such reasonable reply could budge you from your folly. So, instead, I shall lampoon you...

I now type:
I have some gaps in my teeth.

You, based on your documented analytical shortcomings, must (assuming you apply consistent standards) now read the above as stating:
King Prout has NO teeth!