[MineralMan]

Digging further, there is some interesting evidence regarding his work on the dentition of Neanderthal man. It appears that he claimed to have discovered some new bones of a Neanderthal skeleton that had been studied. Apparently, he based part of his book on these new "bones." Sadly, when he submitted them to a museum, they were found to be pieces of rock, not bones, and not fossils. He's still arguing that he was right, but the analysys from the museum appears to be pretty conclusive.

A search on his name will bring up all this information.

If he lied about the bones, what else did he lie about? It's not nice to lie, even if it's in the name of a deity. Not nice at all.

I will leave the decision on who's telling the truth to the examination of anyone interested enough to do the search. Here's the site where the investigator demonstrates that the bones are not bones and not fossils:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/stringercuozzo.html

Here's Cuozzo's site, where he tries to weasel out of the controversy:

http://www.jackcuozzo.com/

Scroll down.

[balrog666]

Sadly, when he submitted them to a museum, they were found to be pieces of rock, not bones, and not fossils.

How positively medvedian!