To: furball4paws
I'm not sure what Dimensio meant by "things", but I would like to know what you mean.I mean the "origin of life". Seems to me that it is a concept that should be discussed in a life sciences class. Just because the ToE doesn't address "origin of life", why do we have to avoid inquiry into this area. It is a "life science"/biology issue.
As for only creationists being confused by the "origin of species" / "origin of life" demarcation, I know that to be a bogus assessment on your part.
197 posted on
09/29/2005 11:19:11 AM PDT by
KMJames
198 posted on
09/29/2005 11:23:07 AM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: KMJames
Seems to me that it is a concept that should be discussed in a life sciences class. Just because the ToE doesn't address "origin of life", why do we have to avoid inquiry into this area. It is a "life science"/biology issue.
Who told you that inquiry into this area was avoided entirely? It's not being avoided, it's just being correctly treated as an issue seperate from the theory of evolution.
203 posted on
09/29/2005 11:38:21 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson