To: Nathan Zachary
"That the pre Darwin believed in creation shouldn't surprise you, and to ASSUME that they would have changed their minds had they heard of Darwin is wrong headed."
And also would not be what I said. I said using them as scientists who support creationism is like using Newton as a scientist who was against General Relativity. It's meaningless. And stupid at best, dishonest at worse. The Steve's in my list all are alive.
"Math isn't science, and half are kooks who haven't a doctorate. which is required on my list."
That's a lie. Most have doctorates. You list is chock full of psychologists and people who lived hundreds of years ago.
145 posted on
09/29/2005 8:19:54 AM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman; Nathan Zachary
That's a lie. Most have doctorates. You list is chock full of psychologists and people who lived hundreds of years ago. And indeed several of the Steves are Nobel Laureates. How many living Nobel Laureates on your list, Nathan? And have you counted the Steves on your list of medical doctors and professors of linguistics?
164 posted on
09/29/2005 9:22:57 AM PDT by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson